FacebookInstagramTwitterContact

 

Dog Rescued For Being Too Skinny Is Now On A Diet After Getting Too Fat           >>           Kendra Wilkinson Admits to More ''Marital Problems'' With Hank Baskett           >>           Organic Family Farm Ruined By Herbicide Drift: A Case Study (And Warning For Humanity)           >>           Fruits And Vegetables Improve Lung Function: Just One Extra Serving Every Day Can Decrease Your Risk Of Disease By 24%           >>           Go For A Brisk Walk Every Day To Protect Your Brain           >>           Research Confirms: Eating A Variety Of REAL Food And Staying Physically Active Is The Key To Lasting Brain Health           >>           Facts About Spacex's Falcon Heavy Rocket           >>           Halltekamp Bridge to be completed despite suspension           >>           Singapore tops 4G speeds worldwide, but falls short on network availability: Report            >>           Gremio Star Arthur Close To Barcelona Move           >>          

 

SHARE THIS ARTICLE




REACH US


GENERAL INQUIRY

[email protected]

 

ADVERTISING

[email protected]

 

PRESS RELEASE

[email protected]

 

HOTLINE

+673 222-0178 [Office Hour]

+673 223-6740 [Fax]

 



Upcoming Events


Brunei Gastronomy Week
February 23rd, 2018 | 08:00 AM


Negara Brunei Darussalam 34th National Day
February 23rd, 2018 | 10:00 AM





Prayer Times


The prayer times for Brunei-Muara and Temburong districts. For Tutong add 1 minute and for Belait add 3 minutes.


Imsak

: 05:06AM

Subuh

: 05:16AM

Syuruk

: 06:34AM

Doha

: 06:57AM

Zohor

: 12:35PM

Asar

: 03:53PM

Maghrib

: 06:34PM

Isyak

: 07:44PM

 



The Business Directory


 

 



World Business


  Home > World Business


`Tax the Rich' Is IMF's Unlikely New Mantra in Fight With Trump


Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

 


 October 12th, 2017  |  09:50 AM  |   540 views

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

The International Monetary Fund spent decades telling the world’s governments how to run their economies on an American-inspired blueprint that became known as the Washington Consensus.

 

There wasn’t much consensus between the Fund and the White House on Wednesday, as they got embroiled in an unusually public disagreement over President Donald Trump’s tax plans.

 

The flashpoint was a new IMF paper arguing that developed nations can share prosperity more evenly, without sacrificing growth, by shifting the income-tax burden onto the rich. “Excessive inequality can erode social cohesion, lead to political polarization, and ultimately lower economic growth,” it said. The study came out as Trump was hitting the road to promote the biggest overhaul of America’s tax code in decades. The Tax Policy Center, echoing most independent analysts, says it will benefit high-earners most.

 

As it hosts the world’s financial leaders in Washington this week, the IMF has been celebrating a global recovery that’s gathering pace after the crash of 2008. But old economic certainties -- the kind that once prevailed at such gatherings -- are proving harder to put back together, and new concerns are forcing their way onto the agenda. The Fund has been rowing back from many of the policy prescriptions it used to hand out. Meanwhile, in developed economies, voters have expressed frustration with what they perceive to be the unequally shared fruits of free trade and open borders -- most dramatically in the U.S., by electing Trump.

 

‘$4,000 Raise’

The Trump administration took immediate aim at the Fund’s analysis.

 

A senior Treasury official disputed the conclusion that less-progressive tax rates could slow growth and make inequality worse. The official said Trump’s proposed cuts will leave the median American worker better off. The Treasury questioned the Fund’s forecasting too, suggesting the prediction for U.S. growth should have factored in Trump’s tax plans, and been higher as a result.

 

The president’s proposals include lower charges on corporations, and a cut in the top rate of income taxes -- though Congress will be given an option to make the wealthiest Americans pay more. In a major speech on his plans in Pennsylvania late on Wednesday, Trump said the change in corporate taxes will deliver a $4,000 pay raise for the typical household.

 

Trump campaigned on a pledge to stand up for workers in regions hurt by globalization, and he’s argued that slashing the corporate tax rate will boost productivity, employment and wages.

 

Cohn vs Bannon

 

But the proposals have split the Republican coalition that helped elect him. Gary Cohn, the president’s chief economic adviser, is among the plan’s main architects. The former Goldman Sachs executive called the chance to work on tax reform with Trump a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.”

 

Steve Bannon, who helped Trump’s election campaign tap into populist unrest, has backed a higher rate for the rich. Bannon is gone from the White House, ousted after a few months as an adviser there, but his continued sway over the party was apparent last month when his nominee defeated a Trump-endorsed candidate in Senate primaries in Alabama.

Trump’s a real-estate billionaire, and while he took the occasional pot-shot at Wall Street, inequality wasn’t central to his electoral pitch. The presidential candidate who played that note loudest was Bernie Sanders. The Vermont senator railed against the outsized influence of the wealthy, in a campaign that took the self-proclaimed socialist much closer to the Democratic nomination than pundits had expected. Sanders also took regular shots at the kind of economic orthodoxies that the IMF once routinely endorsed.

 

But the Fund’s thinking has changed.

 

It’s suggested that capital controls have their uses. It’s acknowledged that austerity in Europe was based on assumptions about fiscal multipliers that turned out to be wrong. In a much-cited paper last year, it argued that the package of policies labeled as “neoliberalism” may have been “oversold.” On Wednesday, it said that re-directing resources for education and health-care from the rich to the poor can address gaps in social programs.

 

The shift may have brought the IMF more closely in line with many governments -- but not, evidently, with Trump’s. And that’s a potential problem for the Fund.

 

The U.S. was the driving force behind the IMF’s creation after World War II to oversee the international currency system. But Trump has expressed skepticism about institutions like NATO, which he sees as obsolete holdouts from that era -- and about globalization in general. His election left many analysts wondering what was in store for the IMF.

 

On Wednesday, after the tax dispute erupted, White House budget director Mick Mulvaney said the Fund was among the skeptics that are “heavily invested” in the failure of Trump’s tax plans. And the Treasury official said the IMF and its sister institution, the World Bank, should focus on using their resources effectively.

 

The biggest contributor to those resources is the U.S. government.

 


 

Source:
courtesy of BLOOMBERG

by Saleha Mohsin and Andrew Mayeda

 

If you have any stories or news that you would like to share with the global online community, please feel free to share it with us by contacting us directly at [email protected]

 

Related News


Big-Nosed Males Get The ‘Girls’

 2018-02-22 08:40:32

North Korea's Kim Yo-Jong Baby Rumours Fascinate South

 2018-02-22 09:04:25

Singapore's Central Bank Gets A Trigger For Tightening

 2018-02-22 09:41:20